KAJIAN TEORI KONSTRUKTIVIS SOSIAL DAN SCAFFOLDING DALAM PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA
Abstract
This study aims to conduct a theoretical study of social constructivism and scaffolding in mathematics learning. Social constructivism is a learning approach that emphasizes collaboration and social interaction between teachers and students, as well as among students, to create understanding of mathematical concepts. Scaffolding is a supportive strategy used by teachers to assist students in understanding the material by providing appropriate assistance based on their level of comprehension. The literature review method is employed in this research to gather data from various sources relevant to social constructivism and scaffolding in mathematics learning. The study presents an in-depth overview of both theories and their application in the context of mathematics education. The findings of this research are expected to provide valuable insights for educators, curriculum developers, and stakeholders in optimizing the implementation of social constructivism and scaffolding in mathematics learning. By understanding and effectively applying these concepts, it is hoped that mathematics education can become more interactive, meaningful, and supportive of enhancing students' comprehension and academic achievement.
References
Alton-Lee, A. (2003). Quality teaching for diverse students in schooling; Best evidence synthesis. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.
Anghileri, Julia. 2006. Scaffolding Practices that Enhance Mathematics Learning. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9: 33-52.
Azevedo, R., & Hadwin, A. (2005). Scaffolding self-regulated learning and metacognition – Implications for the design of computer-based scaffolds. Instructional Science, 33, 367–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-005-1272-9.
Bakker, A., Smit, J., & Wegerif, R. (2015). Scaffolding and dialogic teaching in mathematics education: introduction and review. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47(2015), 1047–1065.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0738-8.
Belland, B. R., Walker, A. E., Olsen, M. W., & Leary, H. (2015). A ilot meta-analysis of computer based scafoolding in STEM education. Educational Technology and Society, 18(1), 183–197.
Bruner, J. S. (1975a). A communication to language – A psychological perspective. Cognition, 3 (3), 255–287.
Bruner, J. S. (1975b). The ontogenisis of speech acts. Journal of Child Language, 2(1), 1–19.
Chaiklin, S. (2003). The zone of proximal development in Vygotsky’s analysis of learning and instruction. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. S. Ageyev, & S. M. Miller (Eds.), Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context (pp. 39–64). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Dahlan, J. A., & Rohayati, A. (2014). The Comparison Of Mathematical Understanding And Connection Through Cognitive Conflict Of Piaget And Hasweh. Proceeding of International Conference On Research, Implementation and Education of Mathematics And Sciences 2014, Yogyakarta State University, 18-20 May 2014.
Davis, E. A., & Miyake, N. (2004). Explorations of scaffolding in complex classroom systems. Journal of Learning Sciences, 13(3), 265–272. https://doi.org/10.1207/15327809jls_1303_1.
Depaepe, F., Verschaffel, L., & Kelchtermans, G. (2013). Pedagogical content knowledge: A systematic review of the way in which the concept has pervaded mathematics education research. Teaching and Teacher Education, 34(2013), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.03.001.
Ernest. (1991). The Philosophy of Mathematics Education. London: The Falmer Press Hanbury (1996)
Ernest, P. (2010). Reflections on theories of learning. In B. Sriraman & L. English (Eds.), Theories of mathematics education: Seeking new frontiers (pp. 39–47). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
Fani, T., & Ghaei, F. (2011). Implications of Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) in teacher education: ZPTD and self-scaffolding. Procedia – Social and Behavioural Sciences, 29 (2011), 1549–1554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.396.
Ferguson, S. (2012). Like a bridge: Scaffolding as a means of assisting low-attaining students in mathematics during cognitively challenging tasks. (PhD), Australian Catholic University, Melbourne.
Fuson, K. C. (2009). Avoiding misinterpretations of Piaget and Vygotsky: Mathematical teaching wihtout learning, learning without teaching, or helpful learning-path teaching. Cognitive Development, 24(2009), 343–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2009.09.009.
Gibbons, P. (2002). Scafolding language, scaffolding learning: Teaching second language learners in the mainstream classroom. Portsmouth, UK: Heinemann.
Goe, L. (2007). The link between teacher quality and student outcomes: A research synthesis.Retrieved from Washington, DC: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED521219.pdf
Goos, M. (1999). Scaffolds for learning: A sociocultural approach ro reforming mathematicsteaching and teacher education. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 1, 4–21.
Goos, M., Galbraith, P., & Renshaw, P. (2002). Socially mediated metacognition: Creatingcollaborative zones of proximal development in small group problem solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49, 193–223.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London, UK: Routledge.
Holton, D., & Clarke, D. (2006). Scaffolding and metacognition. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 37(2), 127–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390500285818.
Hudojo. (1998). Pembelajaran Matematika menurut Pandangan Konstruktivisme. (Makalah disajikan dalam Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika PPS IKIP Malang). Malang.
Jazby, D. (2016). An ecological analysis of mathematics teachers’ noticing. Paper presented at the Opening up mathematics education research. Proceedings of the 39th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. Adelaide.
Lermen, S. (2014). Learning and knowing mathematics. In T. Rowland & P. Andrews (Eds.), Master class in mathematics education: International perspectives on teaching and learning (Vol. 46, pp. 15–26). London, UK: Continuum Publishers.
Myhill, D., & Warren, P. (2005). Scaffolds or straight jackets? Critical momemnts in classroom discourse. Educational Review, 57, 55–69.
Nesher, P. (2015). On the diversity and multiplicity of theories in mathematics education. InE. Silver & C. Keitel-Kreidt (Eds.), Pursuing excellence in mathematics education: Essays in honor of Jeremy Kilpatrick (pp. 137–148). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Oh, P. S. (2005). Discursive roles of the teacher durimng class sessions for students presenting their science investigations. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 1825–1851.
Pea, R. D. (2004). The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education and human activity. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13 (3), 423–451.
Prediger, S., & Pohler, B. (2015). The interplay of micro- and macro-scaffolding: An empirical reconstruction for the case of an intervention on percentages. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47 (7), 1179–1194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0723-2.
Puntambekar, S., & Hubscher, R. (2005). Tools for scaffolding students in a complex learning environment: Have we gained and what have we missed? Educational Psychologist, 40(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4001_1.
Renshaw, P. 2013. The social cultural and emotional dimensions of scaffolding. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 2(1).
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2014). What makes for powerful classrooms, and how can we support teachers in creating them? A story of research and practice, productively intertwined. Educational Researcher, 43(8), 404–412. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X14554450.
Schwartz, D. L., Bransford, J. D., & Sears, D. (2005). Efficiency and innovation in transfer. In J. P. Mestre (Ed.), Transfer of learning from a multi-disciplinary perspective (pp. 1–52). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Simon, M. (1995). Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(2), 114–145.
Simon, M. A. (2013). Promoting fundamental change in mathematics teaching: A theoretical,methodological, and empirical approach to the problem. ZDM Mathematics Education, 2013 (45), 573–582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0486-6.
Smit, J., & Van Eerde, H. A. A. (2011). A conceptualisation of whole class scaffolding. British Educational Research Journal, 39(5), 817–834.
Swan, M., Wake, G., & Joubert, M. (2006). Developing Conceptual understanding through Cognitive Conflict and Discussion in Mathematics and Science Education. Centre for Research in Mathematics Education University of Nottingham: FaSMEd Position Paper.
Stone, C. A. (1998). Should we salvage the scaffolding metaphor? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 409–413.
Taylor, L. (1993). Vygotskian Influence in Mathematics Education, with Particular Reference to Attitude Development. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics. Spring & Summer Edition. Volume 15, Numbers 2 & 3. (halaman 3-16). Center for Teaching/Learning of Mathematics.
van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher-student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 271–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11858-015-0738-8.
van Oers, B. (2014). Scaffolding in mathematics education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 535–538). Dordtrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Science+Business Media.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. In Gauvain & Cole (Eds.), Readings on the development of children (pp. 34–40). New York: Scientifica American Books.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. In R. W. Rieber & A. S. Carton (Eds.), The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky: Problems of general psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 39–285). New York: Plenum Press.
Wilson, B., Teslow, J.L., Taylor, L. (1993). Instructional Design Perspectives on Mathematics Education With Reference to Vygotsky’s Theory of Social Cognition. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics. Spring & Summer Editions. Volume 15, Numbers 2 & 3. (halaman 65 – 85). Center for Teaching/Learning of Mathematics.
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89–100.
